With Social media discussion, Honestly promoting and giving latest Entertainment, Political, Sports and Government news updates in a legal way !. A very Heart-full thanks to ACM Team and CHENNAI METRO Evening news paper team to given an opperchunity to publish their invaluable news and magazine's!
Monday, 9 April 2012
2002 Gujarat Ode massacre case: 23 convicted, 23 acquitted
AHMEDABAD: A special
court here today convicted
23 people for their role in
the Ode village massacre
case of 2002 and acquitted
another 23 for the want of
evidence. The quantum
of punishment will be announced
by the special court
later today.
Today’s verdict comes
nearly a decade after 23 people
were burnt to death by a
riotous mob of over 1500
people on March 1, 2002 at
Ode village in Anand district
of Gujarat.
Special court judge PB
Singh delivered verdict
against 47 people, who were
accused in the case. The Ode
massacre was one amongst
the nine post-Godhra riot
cases investigated by the
Supreme Court appointed
Special Investigating Team
(SIT). The massacre took
place after 59 karsevaks
were charred to death in the
fi re that broke out in the S6
compartment of Sabarmati
Express train at Godhra railway
station on February 27,
2002.
The case was fi rst investigated
by the local police
but, later, it was handed
over to the Supreme Courtappointed
SIT, which fi led
a charge-sheet against 47
accused in the case. One of
the accused died during trial
while two others fl ed abroad
after getting bail and have
been evading trial. The SIT
has urged the court to place
the incident in the rarest of
the rare category. It is, therefore,
likely to seek capital
punishment or life sentence
for the accused who were allegedly
actively involved in
the massacre.
Out of the 10 riot cases
investigated by the SIT on
the instructions of the Apex
Court, this would be the
third in which a judgment
will be given. Last year,
the special courts set up fortrial of the riot cases had
pronounced judgment in the
Sabarmati Express train carnage
case and the Sardarpura
riot case of Mehsana district.
In the Ode case, special
prosecutor PN Parmar had
earlier argued on behalf of
the SIT that the complicity
of the accused in the case
had been established from
the evidences on record and
eyewitness accounts, in addition
to the scientifi c and
medical evidence.
He had further argued
that the court should look
at the gravity of the offence
in which nine children were
among the 23 innocent people
killed by the mob.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment